About these ads

Dan the Man's Movie Reviews

All my aimless thoughts, ideas, and ramblings, all packed into one site!

Hugo (2011)


I guess Marty got tired of making films about people getting murdered so he decided to get in touch with his inner-child. No, not I’m not talking about Leo.

When his father dies, 12-year-old orphan Hugo (Asa Butterfield) takes up residence behind the walls of a Parisian train station. There, he meets Isabelle (Chloe Moretz), the daughter of filmmaker Georges Méliès, who holds the key to Hugo’s destiny.

Knowing that this is Martin Scorsese‘s first family-film and the trailer was kind of cheesy considering it had that really bad song by 30 Seconds to Mars in it, my expectations were pretty low despite all of the non-stop positive reviews. However, I’m glad to say I was duped once again.

What Scorsese does perfectly here is bring out the most exuberant flair as a visual arts director then in anything else we have ever seen him in. I don’t normally see films in 3-D because I think they’re are a waste of money and 9 times out of 10, the 2-D versions end up being the same thing as the 3-D one. However, I went into this one with the glasses and everything, and I have to say that almost every single shot here is perfectly made with lush and gorgeous visuals that will take you inside of this colorful little place where it seems like Scorsese had Van Gogh do the film’s art-work himself. I mean this guy makes screws look beautiful. That has almost never been done.

Another great element about this flick is how Scorsese is able to basically send a love-letter to all of the silent film era stars who have inspired him to do what he does best, but it doesn’t feel like he’s just kissing these peoples asses the whole time, he actually creates his own story and adds a silent film-look onto it as well. There are some scenes where there is barely any talking at all and it’s all about how the score, sounds, and art-work all look to make sure you aren’t bored one bit. Basically, anybody that is a film-lover, like yours truly, will love all of the homages and shout-outs to all of Scorsese’s homeboys but the film is also something for kids to watch even if they don’t get all of the silent film stuff right off the bat. However, that’s why they invented Google kids.

The biggest problem for this flick is that it does take quite a bit of time to get started and that usually doesn’t bother me but the first hour or so, was terribly boring and actually had me zoning in-and-out of the film, which barely ever happens. The first part is your typical little kiddie movie that I’ve seen far way too many times for my own liking where the two kids both talk about being reckless, free, and adventurous but then everything sort of just goes back to normal once they realize their kids. It also a long flick (clocking in at 127 minutes) but then again, coming from Scorsese I wasn’t expecting a 1 hour series premiere.

Another major problem I had with this flick was the fact that I think it’s central story, you know the story about the orphaned kid who’s father dies, kind of gets lost by the end. I don’t want to give away too much but there is a big “twist” in the story that gets more attention than the real story at-hand, which is something I was kind of disappointed about because I think they could have made a real emotionally-realistic story about a kid who misses his daddy, but they went with something else. The story they ended up going with was not a problem for me but I still think they could have a done a bit of better job of focusing on the real story they started with.

The performances from everybody involved is also great as well. The kiddie performances from Asa Butterfield and Chloe Moretz are good but they have done better in the past, and they kind of get lost by the end of the film. Sacha Baron Cohen plays Gustav the Station Inspector and is a perfect fit for this role because he seems like a silent film star villain where he uses his goofy emotions on his face to express his villainous acts and the terrific dialogue matches well with those emotions too.

Ben Kingsley is the real show here to watch as he gives a totally heart-breaking performance that goes way back to his wonder days when he was in talks for Oscar-bait every year. Kingsley had me worried at first because I thought I was going to hate this angry and grumpy old man but somehow he turns that around with a sad and grief-stricken character that brings out the most emotion I felt for the whole entire film. It’s definitely a good performance that I wouldn’t be surprised got him a nomination come Oscar time but it is definitely enough to make me forgive him for BloodRayne. But I understand, a man’s gotta make a living somehow.

Consensus: Hugo may not get fully off its grown in the first hour or so, but Martin Scorsese makes this love letter to his favorite films growing up something else that’s stacked with utterly gorgeous, luscious, and amazing visuals that everybody should definitely go and experience in 3-D no matter what.

8.5/10=Matinee!!

About these ads

45 responses to “Hugo (2011)

  1. Rodney Twelftree November 30, 2011 at 12:26 pm

    Yeah. Sorcese is the man. I’m seeing this soon.

  2. Rodney Twelftree November 30, 2011 at 12:34 pm

    And by that I mean “Scorcsese”.

  3. Rodney Twelftree November 30, 2011 at 12:35 pm

    Ahhhhhhh hell with it. Damn this stupid keyboard and my inability to spell Scorsese correctly….

  4. Vik V. November 30, 2011 at 1:08 pm

    I was skeptical about this one at first, but there’s positive reviews all over the place. Gotta wait until December 21st though…

    • CMrok93 December 3, 2011 at 5:39 pm

      I didn’t really think anything was going to special about this until I saw the reviews, then I was instantly persuaded. Hopefully you like it when it comes around Vik!

  5. mducoing November 30, 2011 at 3:20 pm

    I found that the boring in the film outweighed the beauty (even though there certainly was that) and overall this film was very clumsy, had plot lines that either were completely irrelevant or were lost in the end and inconsistent presentation. It was trying too hard to be great and in the end, left me wishing I had seen something, anything else. Great review, especially near the end where you start agreeing with me more. =)

    • CMrok93 December 3, 2011 at 5:41 pm

      I didn’t love it like certain others did but I can easily say that it was a very pretty film too look at and I’m sorry if you didn’t like it as much. Thanks though yo!

  6. Awesome Barnhart November 30, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    Great review, as you know I loved this. Yeah the kids might not understand everything, but at least they will be visually satisfied and then their parents can explain the silent film stuff. But it’s a film buffs dream movie for sure.

  7. Bryan Parrill November 30, 2011 at 5:06 pm

    I guess I see the connection between the first hour and the Kingsley stuff more than most. Sure it seems like it’s going to be one thing and then it turns into something different, but it all stays thematically relevant.

    Hugo is looking for his place in the world…Kingsley has lost his, together …you get the idea. One informs the other. I say as much in my review.

  8. VictorsMovieReviews November 30, 2011 at 5:55 pm

    Good observation about the initial focus of the film being about the loss of Hugo’s father getting downgraded by the end of the movie. But like you I still greatly enjoyed this film.

    Thanks for the review.

  9. Pete November 30, 2011 at 9:12 pm

    Wasn’t convinced by the trailer at all but like so many others, these reviews are turning me around quick. Love Sacha Baron Cohen but thought from the trailer, his comedic prowess would be toned down for the kiddy-friendly film. If it’s a love letter to cinema, no wonder all us film lovers are getting all excited about it! Hopefully your review has slightly managed to readjust my expectations after reading so many 5 star reviews!

  10. Steven Flores November 30, 2011 at 10:25 pm

    This is becoming one of my favorite films of 2011. I enjoyed it so much. I would totally go see another Scorsese family film. Maybe a gangster family movie with de Niro as a mob father trying to save the day with help from his young kids. It could work!

    • CMrok93 December 3, 2011 at 5:49 pm

      Haha hey it could quite possibly just work, I mean it would probably be a hell of a lot better than those crappy “Focker” flicks that De Niro’s always doing.

  11. Dan November 30, 2011 at 11:23 pm

    Fantastic. Great to see this living up to expectations.

  12. omnivorouscinephile December 1, 2011 at 12:15 am

    You’re right about the trailer, Dan. It wasn’t in the “Children of Men”/Worst Trailer for a Good Movie class, but it didn’t make me want to run to the theater. The over 90 rating on Rotten Tomatoes did, though, and I’m glad I did.

  13. Mary :) December 1, 2011 at 1:23 am

    You’re writing is really really easy to read, and it’s enjoyable, too. I love how the sentence flow and everything. I haven’t seen it yet, but I’m really intrigued after reading this. Thanks for the great job.

  14. Abrahim Mahallati December 1, 2011 at 1:30 am

    Great comprehensive review, you really nailed how I felt about the film. Even with its flaws, I hope this film isn’t forgotten and serves as a reminder of how 3D can be used to the advantage of the film.

  15. fogsmoviereviews December 1, 2011 at 1:58 am

    GREAT review man.

    First review I’ve seen (other than mine) that really acknowledged the problems the film occasionally has with pacing. Finally feel like I see eye to eye with someone on it. Everyone else has been raving like it was movie perfection.

    It is good, it is enjoyable, Scorsese is a master… but there’s some issues.

    Well put dude.

  16. Castor December 1, 2011 at 6:10 am

    This movie didn’t really work completely for me. As you noted, it is a bit slowly paced and doesn’t really pick up much steam until maybe the last half hour of the movie. It also kind of felt like two distinct stories and the acting by Butterfield and Moretz was a bit off the mark I thought. Scorsese honoring the silent era and love for movies will definitely get to cinephiles but I think as a family film, you can do better.

    • CMrok93 December 3, 2011 at 5:55 pm

      It’s not a perfect film by any means because there are problems no matter what and where you look at however, a lot of that is over-shadowed by many other great elements to this film. Thanks though Castor!

  17. Scott Lawlor December 1, 2011 at 10:04 am

    I haven’t read fully, I must admit. I am hoping to take the girls to see this at the weekend. But seeing such a good score here I am pretty happy. Nice one Dan

  18. Kristin December 1, 2011 at 2:37 pm

    I’ve been debating whether or not to see this movie for a while–thanks for the review! Normally I am SO opposed to 3D, like yourself, but there are those rare films where the visuals are stunning and make the film worth watching in 3D. I think I might go see this one now!

  19. cuttingedgecreativity December 1, 2011 at 5:07 pm

    Lmao. You know, my review for this has been sitting in my draft queue for a little while now; my life has just kept me so busy I haven’t been able to get around to it. Hopefully I’ll get a chance to this weekend though. Hope you’ll check out mine once I get it up. :)

    I agree with you pretty much completely on all counts. I also really enjoyed the 3-D effects; and yes, I also agree usually the 2-D and 3-D are pretty much the same, but I think it’s because they don’t have the right projector & screen–I’ve seen a 3-D movie at a museum with super crappy content where the stuff literally flies off the screen. If only more theaters had that…

    I totally saw this in 3-D by accident because it was the only one available in the narrow window I had to see it, but I think it was meant to be, haha. I enjoyed how it seems to be a tribute for film lovers and movie goers, but I do agree it started pretty slow; however, I want to say probably a lot of it has to do with whether or not you were familiar with the book beforehand (which I think probably would have helped immensely, walking in). What do you think?

    • CMrok93 December 3, 2011 at 6:00 pm

      I think so too but I do have to say that regardless of the book, I still liked this film and thought that it did a lot to keep people interested and entertained. Thanks!

  20. mmonty86 December 3, 2011 at 6:52 am

    I absolutely loved Hugo. Outside of the wonder and majestic premise, Hugo clearly demonstrated the affection that Scorsese has for film history. Truly one of the year’s best films.

  21. Matthew Hurst December 4, 2011 at 8:49 am

    I think that it was very pretty but I’m not sure that I can forgive the narrative problems which I think it suffered from. I agree; Sacha Baron Cohen was one of the better things about this film, and that Scorsese’s fingerprints were all over the visuals… I just wish his hand had held a pen with which to write a better script “/ Great review – I didn’t pick up on the homage scenes. I think the score was by Howard Shore, so I must have been lost in the music! (Thanks for your comment on my review by the way :D)

  22. Dan Scott Lintott December 4, 2011 at 3:07 pm

    Really enjoyed this movie. I think you’re right that the some of the best parts are the beautiful shots. The overview of Paris is particularly good. Nice work!

  23. ericsvoice December 4, 2011 at 11:34 pm

    This one was a wonderful gift for movie lovers. Highly recommended.

  24. thereelreviewer December 5, 2011 at 5:23 am

    Loved the silent film stuff, and I didn’t even mention that in my review. >_< It's been a while. Haha, I need to look at yours more so I can come up with my own way to incorporate some sort of uniformity in my reviews. But good review!

  25. Klaus December 5, 2011 at 5:00 pm

    “Marty got tired of making films about people getting murdered” — heh, heh…yeah, quite a change of pace, but i’m not sure how much of a “family film” this is? I just can’t imagine a lot of kids with the patience to sit through, let alone care about who Georges Méliès was. Having said that – it’s one of my favourite films of the year.

  26. Pingback: Russel Crowe to build Noah’s Ark « Valley of the Deer

  27. m.brown June 25, 2012 at 5:04 pm

    Forgot about my initial feelings about Kingsley. When he handed him the burnt journal, I thought he was the biggest a-hole in cinematic history.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,664 other followers

%d bloggers like this: