About these ads

Dan the Man's Movie Reviews

All my aimless thoughts, ideas, and ramblings, all packed into one site!

Monsters (2010)


You thought illegal aliens were bad, what about actual aliens?!?

Six years ago a NASA space probe crashed to earth with a shipload of alien stowaways on board – in the time since, a massive section of the Mexico-US boarder has been fenced off and is now quarantined as an ‘infected zone’. Photojournalist Andrew (Scoot McNairy) is keen to get pictures of the creatures, but when he’s tasked with getting his boss’s daughter (Whitney Able) back to the US, a one-day trip turns into a surprising journey.

I have to give a lot of credit to director Gareth Edwards, who practically made this film for only $500,000 dollars and does a pretty damn good job with it. Actually, it’s probably a lot better than half of the big, studio flicks that come out every month and have about 20 times the budget and still can’t deliver. Take that Hollywood!

A huge problem with this flick that people may have here is that the title and premise has you thinking that you’re going to get plenty of alien action, filled with space ships, ray guns, universal translators, and all of that other crazy alien shit we see but that isn’t the case we have here. In fact, it’s more of an “Adults Only” sci-fi flick (not in that type of way you pervs) and is a lot more character-driven than you would expect, which was a nice touch here. It was sort of like we were joining these two peeps on the road trip from hell taking place in a future that isn’t as destructive as you would think with a whole bunch of aliens constantly running around, instead, it just looks like a wasteland that is still itching for order and control without Edwards ever shoving it in our face that something catastrophic happened here.

Edwards also did a great job of shooting on location, using actual locals that he would find off the streets for the parts, and add in the CGI later. It gave the film this real authenticity where it seems like everything is actually happening right in front of our eyes, and even though we all know it’s not real and this will probably never ever happen, it still feels like a snapshot of what our world could come to in the near future. I mean the whole film is one big metaphor for illegal immigration, so it sort of does make sense after all. Basically, give this Edwards guy a whole bunch of moolah and let him do whatever the hell he wants to do with it because the guy can deliver a lot more than certain directors out there like Roland Emmerich. However, I did like Anonymous, so I can’t knock on the guy too much.

For some odd reason though, as much as I liked and can give a lot of credit to Edwards for his low-budget film-making, I couldn’t help but feel that it took a lot away from the story as well. The obstacles that Edwards puts in here, weren’t enough to actually leave a mark on me, and yes, I did crave a lot more action than this film delivered with. I know, I know I should be shamed about this but I wanted more alien action and shenanigans because it would have really kept more of my interest when the film started to just really linger on and on with these two peeps walking, talking, and sometimes, running. Definitely don’t go into this expecting an Independence Day-like alien flick or else you’ll be left more pissed off than piss happy.

I also may seem like sort of a dick for talking ish about this other element of the flick, but I just have to go with it. I don’t know what it was here that bothered me but almost every time a CG helicopter came up in the flick, whether it was just roaming around or not, I was taken out of this film more and more. They seemed to pop-up in the sky almost every 15 minutes and looked so incredibly fake, whereas everything else was pretty realistic looking and fit well with the rest of the area. I don’t know what it was about these copters but they just seemed so goofy for this type of a serious story.

Because I bought most of the world that Edwards put us in, I actually bought a lot of the characters and feared for their safety as well. Scoot McNairy and Whitney Able are two people that I have never seen before in my life, but both do pretty good jobs of playing these two accidental tourists, Andrew and Samantha. McNairy is good in this a-hole role where he started to peel away his emotions, layer by layer, whereas Whitney, was also very good playing the vulnerable and scared girl role as well. Both had great chemistry together, which they should have because they’re a freakin’ married couple, and both should added a lot more to their scenes, where it’s just the two of them talking basically, a lot more than I expected. No other notable names, other than these two and that’s pretty much all we need.

Consensus: Though it’s not what every sci-fi movie aficionado would like, Monsters is still an impressive debut flick from Gareth Edwards who gives a very original movie with great chemistry between the leads, a story that you care for, and some impressive, low-budget special effects. Hope to see this guy more often!

6.5/10=Rental!! 

About these ads

10 responses to “Monsters (2010)

  1. Parlor of Horror September 2, 2012 at 3:11 pm

    First time I watched this it was not what I expected – more drama than monsters – but watched it again only a couple of weeks ago and thought it was good (big scene at the end was a good pay-off). When we finally see a good shot of the creatures, they are impressive.

  2. Fogs' Movie Reviews September 2, 2012 at 4:55 pm

    I’m not 100% sure that the whole thing is merely a metaphor for immigration (although that’s a pretty easy take on it), I think it has some deeper meanings about love and fear of the unknown, etc. At the end, the “Monsters” turn out to be quite beautiful – and caring to each other at least. It kind of twists the perceptions the viewer has built up to that point.

    I enjoyed it, though I dont think I can argue your grade should be much higher… good job Dan-O

  3. Nick Powell September 2, 2012 at 6:55 pm

    I liked this movie and really hated it as well. There are plenty of scenes that are staged beautifully and the camerawork and light special effects look good, but a lot of the story and interactions with locals and secondary characters was lacking A LOT. The ‘journey’ the two leads had to take felt way too forced and unnatural. Otherwise though, I did find it to be a great look at what a talented filmmaker can do with limited resources. Also, Scoot is going to have his breakout year come this fall with both Argo and Killing Them Softly on the horizon. Can’t wait to see how he stands up against big time actors like Ben Affleck and Brad Pitt. Good review.

  4. Jaina September 2, 2012 at 7:16 pm

    I am a big fan of this film. Shame you didn’t dig it as much as I did. I loved the drama and the two characters. It’s definitely not your average sci-fi flick, and that’s what I really love about it.

  5. Dusty September 2, 2012 at 9:24 pm

    I was disappointed with this film. The story was fine. The acting was fine. The monsters looked great. It was just, boring. Couldn’t hold my attention. Maybe I should give it another try, moods always effect how much we enjoy films. Hopefully I won’t have to fight off napping next time.

  6. Liviania September 3, 2012 at 4:03 am

    I haven’t heard of this one. Sounds like it might be interesting, but also sounds very similar to District 9.

  7. Tim The Film Guy September 3, 2012 at 6:13 pm

    Boring, got very bored. The film was weak and I don’t get why some people seem to like it.

  8. Chip September 5, 2012 at 3:16 pm

    Good points in your review. I also was taken out of this film a couple of times, but that was because of the fact that they decide to try to freaking walk hundreds of miles through the infected zone. Let’s see, is there any other mode of transportation? Flying, maybe? I was able to ignore this after a while, but then when they missed the boat, I again came back to “maybe for some reason planes are outlawed, but why don’t they travel south and get another boat”.

    Of course, the answer is that if they just flew then there wouldn’t be a movie, but I wish they had made the necessity more plausible. Ignoring this, I did like the story in the film.

  9. Matt September 11, 2012 at 1:04 am

    This movie is a crap,,,, so dull and boring lol

  10. Pingback: Movie Roundup: Which of this month’s Blockbusters are Studs and which are Duds? | Sidekick Reviews

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,513 other followers

%d bloggers like this: