About these ads

Dan the Man's Movie Reviews

All my aimless thoughts, ideas, and ramblings, all packed into one site!

About a Boy (2002)


Boys will be boys, even if they are stammering fools.

Will Freeman (Hugh Grant) is a bit of a shallow dude. For one, he closes himself off from the rest of the world, he doesn’t work, he gains all sorts of money off of the royalties for some Christmas song his dad made back in the day and shags plenty of women, although he never plans on, and never actually does, give them a call back or anything. Although, it may make you wonder: Why would somebody who is as charming as Will, actually conjure up a plan to act as if he is a single-daddy, only to connect with more single-mothers, in hopes that he’d be able to nab them as well? Either way though, it doesn’t matter because Will goes for it anyway and wouldn’t you know it? The results don’t go as planned. Not only does he not get nookie, but now he’s got some awkward, mopey teen named Marcus (Nicholas Hoult) who just won’t leave him alone. But little does he know that Marcus has a bit of a problem at home with his suicidal-mommy (Toni Collette) at home, as well as being picked on at school, and is only in need of a friend; something that Will himself may need as well. His only problem is that he doesn’t know it yet.

If anybody out there reading this right now as ever read a Nick Hornby novel, they know one thing about the dude: He knows how to write characters. Not just good characters or those easy-to-define types, nope, he’s more-attuned at writing about and characterizing those certain people in our lives we choose not to be around or associated with, and therefore, would not ever want to spend time with in a movie for a near-two hours.

Exactly how I treat my kids. So yeah, I can totally relate.

Exactly how I treat my kids. So yeah, I can relate.

You know, the unlikable people.

But somehow, Hornby makes these said “unlikable people” actually ones we can actually stand to be around, but even like and, dare I say it, connect with. Because see, Hornby may love it when his characters don’t do the best, most moral things to other people, but he never stops to show us why that said person, does that said immoral act. It actually gets us to grow closer to these characters, just as we’re watching the character themselves grow-up and begin to learn more about being a good, kind person in the world.

You know, like you’re supposed to be.

And with Will Freeman, Hornby truly did give us a d-bag that is not only hardly sympathetic, but pretty damn knowing about his mean ways as well. He knows that he’s lazy, a bum, a dick and a cad-like fella that loves a good shag every now and then, but never anything too severe to where he actually has to start up a relationship with anybody, where commitments, and feelings and all sorts of that icky, gooey stuff gets thrown into the mix. Will just isn’t programmed, but he’s not acting like he is, which sort of makes him interesting to watch. Sure, we know he loves lying to women, in the most manipulative-ways possible so that he can just bed them, but he never really tries to go for anything more than just a god’s-to-honest, simple fling and that’s all. All the ladies out there must hate him, but from one guy to another, I have to say, the guy is pretty damn cool.

That’s also the main reason why the casting of Hugh Grant in the lead role as Will Freeman was not only perfect, but nearly game-changing, in terms of Grant’s career as a head-liner. Grant’s always been the type of bumbling idiot that the dudes love to hate, and their girlfriends secretly want to be with, that’s never really stretched himself too much as an actor and instead, has just relied on two faces: Example A and B. Yes, those same faces have somehow been able to charm just about each and every women across the globe, but it hasn’t really earned him much respect or credit, in terms of just what it is that he’s capable of doing as an actor, and how he’s able to make it seem like he’s more than just another pretty face, who just so happens to have a relatively fine amount of skills as an actor.

But that all changed with Will Freeman, as Grant was not only able to show us that he’s able to be downright funny at times, but that he’s also able to do it while being a bit of a smug prick. You can tell that he’s like a man-child with a million-dollar smile and fine collection of all sorts music, but you can’t always hold it against him, because once Marcus walks into his life, times eventually do change for the guy and even though he does put up a fight against it for practically the whole time, he never does anything too reprehensible to where we totally abandon his character. Eventually too, he begins to realize that he needs Marcus, just as much as Marcus needs him and therefore, they build a lovely chemistry that not only improves over time, but begins to get more and more real, once actual relationships and friendships seem to get all caught up in the mix.

Fast-forward 11 years later, and this kid's slaying Katniss. Chew on that for awhile.

Fast-forward 11 years later, and this kid’s slaying Katniss. Chew on that for awhile.

Needless to say though, Grant is the sole reason why Freeman is the type of character who is worth watching, but also another main reason why this movie deserves to be seen. Makes me wish he did more nowadays, but I guess that whenever we get to see him show up in something, whether it’d be as 2,000 different characters in Cloud Atlas, then that’s fine too. Although, the same can’t be said for Nicholas Hoult who is not only making quite a splash as a leading-man of sorts himself, but is also making a splash into some noteworthy people’s beds, if you know what I mean? Anyway though, that doesn’t matter because Hoult still does a fine enough job here as Marcus to where he’s not non-stop annoying the whole time through. He’s definitely a needy-boy who practically pushes himself onto Will and into his life, but you can’t help but think you’d do the same thing, especially if you saw some middle-aged bum just wasting his life away on game show re-runs.

Together, they’re great and give this movie all the fine heart and soul it clearly needed to survive. Although, if I had to pick a problem I had with this movie, it was that the romance-angle Will had with Rachel Weisz’s character wasn’t all that well-written, or even developed really. Both of them clearly try, and having Rachel Weisz in a movie, is definitely better than NOT having Rachel Weisz in a movie, but it did make me wish her character was given more to work with. At least nearly as much as Toni Collette had to work with, but then again, that woman could make even M. Night Shyamalan’s dialogue work, and sound like Shakespeare, so I won’t even dare mess with her. Yikes!

Consensus: Without ever getting too sentimental or sappy, About a Boy clearly rides the fine line between dark comedy, heart and romance, while also giving Nicholas Hoult and Hugh Grant plenty of time and material to work on their chemistry together, and build a friendship that’s one of the better ones I’ve ever seen on the big screen.

8.5 / 10 = Matinee!!

Learned from the best, kid. Good job!

Learned from the best, kid. Good job! Just stay away from those hookers and you’ll be fine.

Photo’s Credit to: IMDBComingSoon.net

About these ads

29 responses to “About a Boy (2002)

  1. thycriticman February 25, 2014 at 6:55 am

    Lucky dude, that is so unfair, not a fan of this Nicholas Hoult fellow. Why does he get Katniss? Anyways, this was a well written review as usual! The fact that the characters were unlikable, but changed enough so that you would like them is a feat in itself. Sounds like a good film that slipped by my radar…

  2. Terry Malloy's Pigeon Coop February 25, 2014 at 9:01 am

    Agree with your review here mate. Could have been dead sappy but it’s actually pretty good and that scene where they jam together is awesome.

  3. garethrhodes February 25, 2014 at 10:07 am

    I completely agree with your review. Really well said.

  4. whirlwindsupernova February 25, 2014 at 12:18 pm

    Great review. The movie was quite enjoyable. Hugh Grant was great, I thought he was made for the role.

  5. Whit's Movie Reviews February 25, 2014 at 1:02 pm

    Never seen this. That should change, obviously. Terrific review man! I’ll have to check this out.

  6. keith7198 February 25, 2014 at 1:15 pm

    This one never appealed to me but it sounds like it is worth a watch. Good stuff man!

  7. jjames36 February 25, 2014 at 1:40 pm

    I had actually forgotten this was Nicholas Hoult. Huh.

    And I agree the film is quite good.

  8. Sarah February 25, 2014 at 2:24 pm

    I need to see this, I expect I’d really like it. Good review!

  9. chococatania February 25, 2014 at 2:59 pm

    This is one of my favorite movies. I’m not sure how I feel about the TV show, though.

  10. JustMeMike February 25, 2014 at 4:05 pm

    Wow.

    Until yesterday – I had never heard of this film, and was also blissfully unaware that they’ve made a TV Series with the same name, same premise, and a similar Mom of a boy named Marcus.

    Last night, first there was the new Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon, then came the new Late Night Show with Seth Meyers, and then …. following that there’s something called Last Call with Carson Daly. Now, I never ever watch any of these shows. But last night I did or rather they were on the TV while I was on the PC because I had watched The Blacklist.

    On Daly’s show – the guest was David Walton who was discussing the new NBC Comedy Drama, About A Boy. Walton (the new Jim Carrey) plays Will, Minnie Driver is the Mom next door, and a youngster named Benjamin Stockham who is not dissimilar to a younger Angus T. Jones is Marcus.

    Guess what – the pilot was fun and cute, and tonight, at 9:00 PM Eastern, on NBC, I’ll see the first episode following the Pilot.

    And then this morning – I find your review of the film version which dates back to 2002. Just asking – what was your inspiration to have watched the Hugh Grant film? Which I shall now go about seeing based on your review and I guess —- kismet. Thanks for the fine review.

  11. stephen1001 February 25, 2014 at 4:23 pm

    It might be Hugh Grant’s best role – nice points about it being preferable to have Rachel Weisz in the movie & the well written (as per usual) Hornby characters!

  12. ruth February 25, 2014 at 10:34 pm

    I quite like this one! You’re right tho Grant’s character is such a douche bag. Funny seeing how Hoult’s grown, he’s super tall too… and now dating Jennifer Lawrence, not bad, ahah.

  13. Zoë February 26, 2014 at 7:16 am

    Nice review Dan! Haven’t seen this in years, though when I watched it I thought it was decent. I had fun with scenes, and the characters did grow and change nicely.

  14. Russel DDK February 26, 2014 at 9:27 am

    Very good review Dan. One of Hugh Grant’s better movies. This along with “Notting Hill” and “Four Weddings and a Funeral” are the only movies of his which I like.

  15. scottjgdoherty March 4, 2014 at 2:05 pm

    I love this movie! Must watch it soon!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,531 other followers

%d bloggers like this: